The Galaxy Fold, left, and Motorola Razr are foldable phones with little in common.
Earlier this week I suggested that the Motorola Razr could be a foldable phone for the rest of us. At $1,500 it certainly isn’t cheap, and I’m not suggesting everyone run out and buy one on Dec. 26 when preorders start. But compared to the $1,980 Samsung Galaxy Fold, the Razr is a much easier device to wield, and it looks sharper and more phonelike to boot. So while I find the Razr’s design compelling and more natural to use, in many ways, the Galaxy Fold is the better upgrade.
For $500 more (and remember, this is still an eye-watering $2,000 we’re talking about here for the Galaxy Fold) you get more of everything — six cameras compared to two*, 75% more battery capacity and useful extras like wireless charging.Â
Motorola Razr vs. Galaxy Fold: Foldable phone specs compared
The Razr and Fold are stacked with trade-offs when it comes to features and design, and we’re here to compare the early highs and lows. I say “early” because Razr review units are still to come, and along with it our usual array of lab tests and observations from living with the device daily.
Until then, here’s how the Fold’s and Razr’s foldable screens and specs compare.
*Not including the time of flight (ToF) sensor, which is used to assist with low-light shots and can’t be used alone to take photos.
Motorola Razr design feels more practical and thought out
If you want your phone to look like a phone, then the Razr’s vertical flip design will be more for you, compared to the Fold, which opens like a book.Â
The Razr’s smaller, narrower screen (6.2-inch versus the Fold’s 7.3-inch display) isn’t about giving you a tablet and phone in one. It’s about bringing a truly portable device to people who want something smaller to shove into their pockets. That said, the Fold is pocketable in its own way, stacking into a slim, tall phone sandwich.
What impresses me most about the Razr is how all its elements make sense. Its cameras, bezels and buttons fall exactly where they should, unlike the Galaxy Fold, which has a thick plastic bezel and a bulbous notch that takes up a large portion of the screen.
The Galaxy Fold’s big ole notch is hard to love.Â
Motorola already wins the screen crease front
If the thing of a creased plastic screen makes you cringe, you’re out of luck. It’s what soft plastic does, and there’s no way around that for now. But you’ll be gratified to know that in choosing to bend the Razr vertically, Motorola has a short horizontal crease. It’s only as wide as the Razr itself — 2.8 inches compared to the Fold’s vertical crease of 6.3 inches.
Yes, you can still see it and feel it if you try hard enough, but it’s much less noticeable on the Razr than on the Fold, which has a wider crease where the two halves bend closed.
Motorola and Samsung have both built steel plates behind their fragile displays for structure and support. Motorola also claims that its hard coat of plastic on top of the electronic elements is stronger than the Fold’s.
Compared to the Galaxy Fold’s tall central crease, the Razr’s screen seam is itty bitty.
You can do more on the Galaxy Fold’s smallest screen
I never thought I’d appreciate the Fold’s cramped 4.6-inch outer screen until I met the Razr’s 2.7-inch exterior display.Â
The Razr’s tiny screen actually does make sense, since its purpose is mainly to display notifications, along with signal and battery status. But you can open any Android app on the Fold’s outer screen and then launch it on the inside, which makes it more useful if you’re using the Fold closed while on the go. I only wish typing weren’t such a nightmare.
On the other hand, Motorola has limited the Razr’s external screen capabilities to a tidy number of functions, including taking a self-portrait; carrying on a video call or a phone call over speakerphone or Bluetooth connection; and finally, listening to music that you’ve started on the larger screen first.
The 4.6-inch display isn’t great for typing, but at least you can open any Android app while you’re on the go.
Razr’s hinges and foldable display aren’t out of the danger zone
Peer closely at the Motorola Razr and you’ll see that some of its physical elements raise questions and concerns. Its hinge design excels, but the gears are partially exposed on the outside and inside of the phone, which makes me wonder how easily crumbs, paper and fibers could gum up the gears.
There’s also a narrow channel, about the thickness of my fingernail, that separates the display area from the bezel. I already saw dust collect along the top especially, but my main worry is how easily it could be to separate the top coat from the plastic OLED it’s trying to protect.
Samsung ran into trouble with this same area, when early reviewers peeled off a protective top layer that resembled an optional dust guard you’d find on many phones. Removing this layer irreparably damaged the phone. Dust might very well be the worst of the Razr’s problems here, but the Fold’s troubles in this arena make me jumpy.
If you look very closely, you can see a thin channel between the plastic OLED display and the bezel.
The Fold screen could be better for video
An unexpected benefit of the Razr’s chin, the plastic bit that sticks out at the base of the phone, is using it as a grip while watching video.
But the Razr’s beanpole dimensions, which form a 21:9 ratio that Motorola calls Cinemavision, didn’t seem to uniformly complement every video I watched. The screen’s so narrow top to bottom, you pretty much have to watch everything in landscape mode.
Pinch to zoom and you might lose the top and bottom of the frame. Leave it be and you might see big black bars on the side. Hope for the best and the image might perfectly crop.
Samsung’s Galaxy Fold has its own weirdness in the form of the fat notch that sticks into your video like a sore thumb. Since it’s off to one side, the one consolation there is that it doesn’t get in the way of the action.
The Fold’s more regular dimensions make it easier to fill the screen no matter how you hold it.
Razr’s camera system is more elegant, but gives you less to work with
The Galaxy Fold brings you six high-powered cameras that produce excellent photos no matter which screen you use. That might be overkill. If Samsung had chosen a different design, it may have made do with fewer pricey lenses.
Motorola has the opposite problem. It has only one real camera, which means there’s no telephoto or wide-angle capability that you’d expect from a premium phone. The Fold has both those, plus its main camera and three more front-facing sensors besides. Yes, there’s a time of flight sensor (ToF), but that’s used for low-light photography, not for capturing a new focal range.
Back to the Razr, its 16-megapixel camera lives just below that small outer screen and is the main sensor for taking all your photos. You’ll find a 5-megapixel lens when you flip the Razr open, but it’s intended for video calls (which you can also support from the main camera when the phone is closed as long as you initiate it from the interior screen).
I haven’t had a chance to test the camera quality, but will keep a close eye on this when the review unit comes in.
This single Razr camera takes all the photos you’ll need.
Galaxy Fold already wins on extras
Samsung’s foldable phone is a premium device that strives to be the equal of the Galaxy Note 10 Plus and the rest of its top-tier phones.Â
In addition to a greater variety of cameras, it boasts greater screen area, a high-powered processor (Snapdragon 855 versus 710) and wireless charging on the back. You’ll also get double the Razr’s internal storage and RAM. In Korea and the UK, the Fold also comes with 5G support.
The Galaxy Fold has double the internal storage and RAM, and can charge wireless devices on its back.
Razr’s battery life is still up in the air
Motorola promises that the Razr’s battery life will last you all day, and I’m extremely curious to see how well it actually does. That’s because the capacity adds up to a mere 2,500 mAh. For reference, the Google Pixel 4, which has mediocre battery performance, tops the Razr at 2,800 mAh.
Even more suspect, the batteries are split between the two halves of the foldable phone. This balances the device in the hand, but all things being equal, one battery is more efficient than two. We saw the same lower-than-expected performance with the Galaxy Fold as well (4,380 mAh).
On the other hand, the Razr is also a smaller device with far less screen surface to cover on both inner and outer displays, and that midtier Snapdragon processor we talked about above also consumes less power when processing at slightly slower speeds than the most advanced model.Â
The Razr is a smaller phone, with a smaller battery capacity. Is that enough?
So what now?
I’ve fully reviewed the Galaxy Fold (twice!) and have spent a fair number of hours with the Motorola Razr, but this is still just the beginning of comparing these two groundbreaking foldable phones.Â
The next step is to review the Razr as soon as I get it in my eagerly awaiting hands, and then to test the cameras, screen sturdiness and all the rest against the Galaxy Fold. Since the Razr doesn’t ship until sometime in January, it’s likely that many of our questions will remain unanswered for some time.
Until then, read up on what it’s like to use the foldable Motorola Razr and Samsung Galaxy Fold, and peer behind the curtain to see how and why Motorola made the foldable Razr. It’s been a long, strange year for foldable phones, and with these two devices, we’re finally on our way.
Motorola Razr versus Samsung Galaxy Fold
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Display size, resolution
Internal: 6.2-inch, foldable pOLED; 2,142x876p pixels (21:9) / External: 2.7-inch glass OLED, 800×600-pixels (4:3)
Internal: 7.3-inch Dynamic AMOLED; 2,152×1,536-pixels (plastic) / External: 4.6-inch Dynamic AMOLED; 1,680×720-pixels (Gorilla Glass 6)
373ppi (internal screen)
362ppi (internal screen)
Unfolded: 6.8 x 2.8 x 0.28 in / Folded: 3.7 x 2.8 x 0.55 in
Folded: 6.3 x 2.5 x 0.6 in / Unfolded: 6.3 x 4.6 x 0.3 in
Unfolded: 172 x 7 2 x 6.9mm / Folded: 94 x 72 x 14mm
Folded: 62.8 x 161 x 15.7mm ~ 17.1mm / Unfolded: 117.9 x 161 x 6.9mm ~ 7.6mm
Weight (Ounces, Grams)
7.2 oz; 205g
9.7 oz; 276g
Android 9 Pie
Android 9.0 with Samsung One UI
16-megapixel external (f/1.7, dual pixel AF), 5-megapixel internal
12-megapixel (wide-angle), 16-megapixel (ultra wide-angle), 12-megapixel (telephoto)
Same as main 16-megapixel external
Two 10-megapixel, 8-megapixel 3D depth
4K (HDR 10+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2.2GHz, octa-core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Foldable display, eSIM, Motorola gestures, splashproof
Foldable display, wireless charging, fast charging
Price off-contract (USD)
Converts to Â£1,167
Converts to AU$2,183
Originally published last week.
Realme 7i India Launch Teased by CEO Madhav Sheth, Appears on Support Page
Realme 7i is expected to be revealed soon as the company’s India and Europe CEO Madhav Sheth teases the arrival of a Realme 7 series phone on Twitter. The Realme 7 and Realme 7 Pro were launched in India at the beginning of this month and the Realme 7i debuted in the Indonesian market a…
Realme 7i is expected to be revealed soon as the company’s India and Europe CEO Madhav Sheth teases the arrival of a Realme 7 series phone on Twitter. The Realme 7 and Realme 7 Pro were launched in India at the beginning of this month and the Realme 7i debuted in the Indonesian market a couple weeks ago. Now, Sheth has teased a new entrant in the Realme 7 series and it could be the Realme 7i. While the tweet shows a phone with a quad rear camera setup, no other details have been announced around the upcoming smartphone. The Realme 7i has also started appearing on the support page of the company’s India website, hinting at an imminent launch.Realme India and Europe CEO Madhav Sheth tweeted that “something new and exciting” is coming up and more will be revealed soon on the next episode of the ongoing Realme community Q&A series Ask Madhav. The image shared in the tweet shows the back of a phone that appears to be the Realme 7i in its Aurora Green variant, as suggested by its quad rear camera setup. The tweet does not include any information about the phone but from the Indonesian launch, we know pretty much all there is about the Realme 7i, except the Indian pricing.Additionally, the Realme 7i has also started appearing on the company’s India support page. Gadgets 360 independently verified that the Realme 7i has been listed under the Model sub-category on the search page. However, the page hasn’t been populated with any search results or further details as of yet.All of this seems to hint at an imminent launch of the Realme 7i in India.Realme 7i specificationsThe dual-SIM (Nano) Realme 7i runs Android 10 with Realme UI on top. It features a 6.5-inch HD+ (720×1,600 pixels) display with 90Hz refresh rate. The phone is powered by the octa-core Snapdragon 662 SoC with 8GB of LPDDR4x RAM.Speaking of optics, the Realme 7i packs a quad rear camera setup and the sensors are arranged in an L-shape placed within the rectangular camera module. It includes a 64-megapixel primary sensor with an f/1.8 lens, an 8-megapixel sensor with an ultra-wide-angle f/2.2 lens, a 2-megapixel black and white sensor with an f/2.4 lens, and a 2-megapixel macro shooter with an f/2.4 aperture. For selfies, you get a 16-megapixel Sony IMX471 Sensor with an f/2.1 lens, housed in the hole-punch cutout located at the top left corner of the screen.The Realme 7i comes with 128GB of UFS 2.1 onboard storage that is expandable via microSD card. The phone is backed by a 5,000mAh battery with support for 18W fast charging. The phone is offered in Aurora Green and Polar Blue colour options.Is this the end of the Samsung Galaxy Note series as we know it? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or RSS, download the episode, or just hit the play button below. Affiliate links may be automatically generated – see our ethics statement for details.
Nokia 9.3 PureView, Nokia 7.3 5G, Nokia 6.3 Tipped to Launch in November
Nokia 9.3 PureView, Nokia 7.3 5G, and Nokia 6.3 smartphones are expected to launch in November, a report claims. Nokia licensee HMD Global is reportedly planning a major launch event in November where it is expected to unveil the aforementioned phones. The Nokia 9.3 PureView is expected to be a flagship offering from the company…
Nokia 9.3 PureView, Nokia 7.3 5G, and Nokia 6.3 smartphones are expected to launch in November, a report claims. Nokia licensee HMD Global is reportedly planning a major launch event in November where it is expected to unveil the aforementioned phones. The Nokia 9.3 PureView is expected to be a flagship offering from the company and has been subject to leaks for quite some time now. The other two phones, Nokia 7.3 5G and Nokia 6.3, have also seen their fair share of leaks.In its report, NokiaPowerUser cited sources who said that HMD Global is planning to hold a major launch event in November where it may unveil the Nokia 9.3 and the Nokia 7.3 5G. While the sources only mention these two models, the Nokia 6.3 is also expected to be announced at the same event. The report also mentioned that the launch event is still in the planning phase and can be postponed as well if there are any roadblocks. The report further claims that sources in retail also expect Nokia smartphone launches in November or December.Last month, it was reported that HMD Global is planning on holding a major launch event in Q4 2020 where it will unveil the Nokia 9.3 PureView, Nokia 7.3 5G, and Nokia 6.3. If the latest report is to be believed, November could officially be the launch month for these phones.Nokia 9.3, Nokia 7.3 5G, Nokia 6.3: Specifications (expected)The Nokia 9.3 is expected to offer a 120Hz display, a 108-megapixel main camera, and 8K video recording. The Nokia 7.3 5G may feature a 6.5-inch full HD+ display with a hole-punch cutout. It is expected to be powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoC. It may feature a 48-megapixel primary sensor and a 24-megapixel selfie shooter. The smartphone may pack a 4,000mAh battery with support for 18W fast charging.On the other hand, the Nokia 6.3 may feature a larger than 6.2-inch full-HD+ display with PureDisplay branding. The smartphone could be offered with 3GB/ 4GB/ 6GB RAM and 32GB/ 64GB/ 128GB storage options. The Nokia 6.3 may pack a quad rear camera setup, a 16-megapixel selfie camera, and 4,000mAh battery. It may be powered by a Snapdragon 670/ 675 SoC.Is Android One holding back Nokia smartphones in India? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or RSS, download the episode, or just hit the play button below.
9 best kitchen gadgets under $20 that you’ll use every day – CNET
As much as I love my kitchen workhorses — the giant wooden cutting board, measuring cups, microplane and razor-sharp knives — there’s also a special place in my heart for the smaller extras that I don’t strictly need, but that make cooking (and eating!) smooth as butter.After singing their praises to (aka pushing them on) my family and…
As much as I love my kitchen workhorses — the giant wooden cutting board, measuring cups, microplane and razor-sharp knives — there’s also a special place in my heart for the smaller extras that I don’t strictly need, but that make cooking (and eating!) smooth as butter.After singing their praises to (aka pushing them on) my family and friends, I thought I’d share info on these cheap, easy-to-clean favorites with you. They’re all products I actually own and use in real life and that are simple to incorporate into your cooking routine. Most of all, they’re versatile tools you can use daily (I do!), which means they’re not just inexpensive, but also high-value. Here are the tools I never want to be without, and how I use them.
Xujia via Amazon
The wide, saucer-shaped bowl, long handle and pleasant weight make these beautiful spoons perfect for almost everything — eating soup, curries, rice dishes, spooning yogurt out of the tub, spooning anything out of any tub, really. My Korean friend calls them “jjigae spoons” (a type of stew) or rice spoons, but in my family, they’re known as “life-changing spoons,” which is how I first convinced my family to adopt them. I hardly ever use “regular” spoons anymore. You can buy long-handled spoons online or in many Asian markets. My personal preference is to get a set with round handles, not the thin kind with the flat ends. Prices vary, but they’re not expensive either way — say $16 for a pack of 5 good quality spoons, or even $15 for a pack of 8.
I’m sure I could live without a pair of kitchen shears like this one from Henckels (also known for making reliable knives), but I don’t particularly want to. A dedicated pair of shears makes opening food bags, cutting meat and fish and trimming green beans dead-easy. Storing them with your knives or utensils keeps them accessible where you need them and eliminates cross-contamination with your other scissors. Sturdy shears can butterfly poultry and this model unhinges for dishwashing — it’s dishwasher safe if in need of thorough sanitizing, but it usually cleans easily with soapy hot water and a sponge. This particular model costs under $20 on sale.
Bench scrapers, also known as pastry or dough scrapers or cutters, are typically used to pry dough off a work surface, though I use mine multiple times a day for either scraping or lifting items from my cutting board to a pan or bowl. I used to use the side of whichever knife I had in my hand, but this useful kitchen tool shovels more diced onions at a time and is safer anyway. I’ve also used straight-sided bench scrapers, but the offset design is much easier for sliding under a pile of chopped food. It’s equally adept at its intended purpose of working with bread and pastry dough. This Tovolo bench scraper is the one I use and costs around $10.
Lifver Home via Amazon
Small bowls are hardly interesting or new and I have plenty of them, especially fluted and ribbed ramekins. But these wonderful dip bowls have made cooking and serving food more of a delight. I just love them. They’re useful enough for daily prep and pretty enough to serve on. You can mound a surprising amount of food in the hollow, like lemon zest, olive oil, wasabi or even grated cheese like fresh parmesan. They cost $18 for a set of eight 3-ounce bowls.Here’s how I use them:Spoon restUsed tea bag holderSalt piggyEgg holderPrep bowl for ingredients like garlic, shallots, gingerPrep bowl for blending spices (the mix flows into the pan really easily, without getting stuck in creases)Garnish serverServer for individual desserts, like squares of chocolate, a brownie or a tiny scoop of ice creamSugar caddy for after-dinner coffee or teaRing valet (especially when taking off to work with slimy or sticky food)
Prep Solutions via Amazon
My dad endearingly referred to these as “rubber fingers.” This set of two — one with a pointy end (pictured) and one that looks more like a paddle, cost $8 and are awesome for scraping, scooping and pushing down all types of food. Think the last little bit of something gooey like peanut butter from the jar, or getting every little bit of beaten egg out of a small bowl. I still use full-size spatulas for large work bowls, pots and pans, but these nonstick minis work better than spoons or my finger and fit really well into drawer dividers. They’re machine washable, too.
Lodge via Amazon
I had never heard of a pan or pot scraper until my colleague Rich Brown sang its praises. I have an elaborate and finely-tuned method for steaming and scraping off stuck-on crud from pots, pans and bakeware, but I started getting a lot of time back once I began using this $5 tool — or $8 for two.This kitchen gadget fits into your palm and easily scrapes away gunk with its flat and curved edges, which can also better reach into corners. Still expect a little sponge work, but mostly to wipe away loosened and leftover stuff. I was amazed with how my Lodge pot scraper obliterates the scum that builds up in a ring around the pan, say the leftovers of reduced marinara. It cuts through residue faster and more efficiently than a hard plastic spatula and it won’t gunk up the scrubby side of a sponge with cheese, egg or starchy buildup. I recommend keeping it visible on your sink, near your sponges and dish soap. I initially put it into a drawer and forgot about it, but now it’s top of mind.
My friend bought a fancy new dishwasher with built-in wine holders and gave me three purple silicone tubes that help keep your wine glasses safe in the machine. “Here, you like wine,” she said. “You should use these.”She was right. They may look derpy, but this perfect gift probably saved my wine glasses more than once. You fit one grippy end around your overturned stemware (as pictured) and slide the other end, a hollow tube, over a peg on the bottom rack of your dishwasher. A wire that runs two-thirds the length of the attachment supplies structure. If a glass feels extra wobbly in the center of the bottom rack, I’ve been known to clip on two of these silicone holders for extra stability, one on either side. I used to hand-wash my wine glasses and still managed to break one here or there. Not anymore. It costs about $12 for a set of eight. I’ve run them in the dishwasher on a weekly basis for almost two years.
Great for elegantly draining pasta, reaching for items on the top shelf, juicing lemons and even cleaning window blinds. A pair of 9-inch or 12-inch silicone-tipped tongs costs about $15 and has become a trusty kitchen companion that does far more for a chef than just flip browning veggies and meat. Here are seven clever uses for kitchen tongs.
Endurance via Amazon
I love a small saucepan for so many reasons, including frying perfectly round eggs one at a time and reducing broth and sauces. Melting butter and making modest quantities of caramel or hot milk and cream are also great in an itty-bitty pan, especially if you’re trying to keep a small amount of liquid from evaporating too quickly.I bought a “cup measuring pan” that’s a lot like this one, with a long handle, and I like it, though it’s not as thick as some of my other kitchen pots. I’d also happily consider a butter melting pot for butter, sauces, warming milk and boiling single eggs, but I currently use a tiny milk frothing jug for that, intended for espresso. Whichever pan you get should cost between $15 and $25, tops. Mine was about $15.
More kitchen recommendations